Insurance
Unfortunate (and Unexpected) Restriction on Additional Insured Status
March 28th, 2018
The New York Court of Appeals, in a split decision, has focused on one word in deciding that a owner’s construction manager was not entitled to additional insured status on the general contractor’s policy. The contract required the GC to include…
Read More
Read More
When Will We Learn? Contracts Do Not Modify Insurance Policies
October 18th, 2017
A subcontract required the second-tier sub to include the project owner and general contractor as additional insured parties. But the second-tier sub’s insurance policy had a “privity endorsement,” which allows additional insured status only fo…
Read More
Read More
Additional Insured Status Can Arise Indirectly by Lease (or other Written Contract)
September 29th, 2017
Decisions in two separate courts have come to the same conclusion: additional insured status can be conferred via (1) a contract – which was a lease, in each of these cases – requiring Party A to be designated as an additional insured on Party B…
Read More
Read More
Insurer’s Duty to Defend Does Not Include Duty to Pursue Counterclaim
June 22nd, 2017
At first blush this seems simple: “defend” does not mean “prosecute.” But there is a split among jurisdictions as to whether the insurer’s duty to defend includes the duty to pursue a counterclaim that is factually intertwined with the defe…
Read More
Read More
Categories: Insurance
“Arising Out of” is Not the Functional Equivalent of “Proximately Caused by”
June 9th, 2017
The NY Court of Appeals, construing language of an insurance endorsement, has held that the endorsement terms established a proximate cause standard. In the process, the court reiterated that a proximate cause standard is narrower than the phrase “…
Read More
Read More
Unsigned Contract = No Proper Insurance Coverage
May 18th, 2017
File this one under “Oops.” The unsigned contract meant that the contractual liability exclusion in the subcontractor’s insurance policy would control, since there was no obligation “assumed in a contract or agreement . . . [where the claim]…
Read More
Read More
It Doesn’t Pay to Lie – Insurance Edition
April 25th, 2017
The sad part about decisions abrogating insurance coverage, based on misrepresentations by the insurance applicant, is that innocent third parties often suffer from the lack of coverage. A recent Pennsylvania decision provides one more example. The J…
Read More
Read More
Indemnities, and Establishing Priority of Multiple Insurance Policies
April 14th, 2017
Contractor lent a vehicle to a sub, and the sub’s employee caused a fatal accident. The subcontract had an indemnity in favor of the contractor. Five insurance policies were in play: (1) sub’s auto policy, (2) sub’s GL, (3) sub’s umbrella, (4…
Read More
Read More
GL Exclusion for Liability Insured Under a Wrap-Up? Ambiguous.
April 11th, 2017
Per a federal court, a GL exclusion that refers to a “wrap-up” is ambiguous, so the carrier’s request for summary judgment against coverage was denied, and the plaintiffs’ corresponding request to establish coverage was allowed. The underlyin…
Read More
Read More
How Do Additional Insured Obligations Work with Subcontract Flow-Down Clauses?
March 23rd, 2017
They don’t. Unless the subcontract is carefully drafted, that is. So where the prime contract required the owner to be named as an additional insured, and the subcontract flow-down clause passed along the GC’s obligations to the owner, as the sub…
Read More
Read More