An Unfortunate Reminder About Statutes of Limitation: The Triggering Event!

A developer sought to recover $749,000 in fees it claimed should not have been charged by a town. The fees were paid on October 18, 2013, and the developer filed suit to recover the fees on October 17, 2016. The statute of limitations for the developer’s claim is three years. The developer clearly thought it had filed suit just under the wire.

But the statute of limitations accrued, and the clock started to run, when the developer knew of the cause of its claim. The trigger date was not the date of payment (Oct. 18, 2013), but the date when the town advised the developer of the amount due. THAT date was September 27, 2013, when the town passed a resolution requiring payment of the fees.

This case is a reminder that the clock starts to tick when the claim, or cause of action, arises. An invoice, or a payment, may not be the triggering event. The date of the underlying event is most important, and not necessarily the date when the other side refuses to agree with your position, or the date you incur the cost. This developer, thinking it had filed suit just in time, learned otherwise.

The case is Pulte Homes of N.Y. LLC v. Town of Carmel, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 15463 (2nd Cir., June 8, 2018).

About Stan Martin

Stanley A. Martin's Profile Image
Stan Martin holds a law degree and an undergraduate degree in architecture. He has been involved with the construction industry for more than 45 years, working in construction prior to law school and beginning his construction law practice. Over the course of his career, he has served on boards and committees for organizations including the Associated General Contractors of Massachusetts, the Boston Society of Architects, and the Massachusetts Building Congress.

Read More About Stan