From the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeal comes a reminder that undertaking defense of a claim without any reservation of rights can bar an insurer from disclaiming coverage nine months later – even if the claim was not within the policy language from the beginning.
An injured subcontractor employee sued the owner and general contractor, who then sought defense and indemnity from the sub’s carrier. The sub’s carrier “undertook the defense and indemnification of the general contractor and property owner without asserting policy defense or reserving the privilege to do so.” Nine months elapsed before the sub’s carrier determined that it did not owe a duty to defend or an indemnity under the circumstances. Per the court, this was too long, and the owner and general contractor had been prejudiced by the delay.
The carrier ultimately argued that the owner was partially responsible for the worker’s injury, and that the general contractor’s insurance should participate per the “other insurance” clause. But the court noted the carrier’s initial statement, that it would “defend and indemnify” the owner and GC, and the nine-month passage of time before the carrier changed its position. This was prejudicial to both owner and GC, and the sub’s carrier would not be allowed to disclaim either coverage or indemnity obligations.
The case is Sparta Ins. Co. v. Tech. Ins. Co., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 27165 (2nd Cir., Sept. 28, 2018), and is a good reminder for carriers and insured parties alike.
© 2019 Commonsense Construction Law